DRR014575

DDBJ first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

71/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila virilis

Instrument

454 GS Junior

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 32158234 reported

total reads 119533 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 92.3 measured

pct q30 bases 78.3 measured

gc content pct 46.6 measured

mean read length 217.2 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 41.58 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 71/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.3 measured ×1 42%

mean base quality 35 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 41.58 measured ×0.4 74%

QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0