← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Staphylococcus aureus
Instrument
MinION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1072805
reported
total reads
709
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
17.2
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
gc content pct
50.9
measured
mean read length
1513.1
measured
mean base quality
13.2
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0