DRX001103

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

28/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Pinctada fucata

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 208317572 reported

total reads 363721 reported

n content pct 0.026 measured

pct q20 bases 38 measured

pct q30 bases 38 measured

gc content pct 41.8 measured

mean read length 358.5 measured

mean base quality 13.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 45.52 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 28/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 38 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 13.3 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 45.52 measured ×0.4 66%

QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0