← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
What is in it (characterisation + QC)
Captured systematically as the reproduction roadmap touches each dataset: data type, N numbers, completeness, concordance with the paper, QC metrics.
QC grade
A
Data type / assay
hiCLIP (UV-crosslink + proximity-ligation CLIP-seq); ENA library_strategy labelled RIP-Seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
N numbers (samples, groups)
7,984,640 / 5,425,419
Completeness
complete
Delivers what promised
yes