← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
10 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10415582856
reported
total reads
289321746
reported
n content pct
0.017
measured
pct q20 bases
97.4
measured
pct q30 bases
88.7
measured
gc content pct
52.8
measured
mean read length
36
measured
mean base quality
34.4
measured
adapter content pct
27.07
measured
duplication rate pct
68.18
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 66/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
88.7
measured
×1
94%
mean base quality
34.4
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
27.07
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
68.18
measured
×0.4
15%
QC cost
31 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0