ERP001038

ENA first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

40/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

454 GS Junior

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

12 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1962058961 reported

total reads 2294698 reported

n content pct 0.034 measured

pct q20 bases 80.5 measured

pct q30 bases 49.3 measured

gc content pct 58.2 measured

mean read length 447 measured

mean base quality 28.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 17.51 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 40/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 49.3 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 17.51 measured ×0.5 70%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0