ERP001280

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Danio rerio

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

155 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 451587654944 reported

total reads 3119018118 reported

n content pct 0.093 measured

pct q20 bases 98 measured

pct q30 bases 87.6 measured

gc content pct 44 measured

mean read length 54 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0.05 measured

duplication rate pct 9.13 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.6 measured ×1 88%

mean base quality 35 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.05 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 9.13 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 14 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0