← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
12 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
55902666856
reported
total reads
367781015
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
100
measured
pct q30 bases
100
measured
gc content pct
43
measured
mean read length
76
measured
mean base quality
66
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
17.74
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 95/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
100
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
17.74
measured
×0.5
83%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0