← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 13 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
13 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
973690183870
reported
total reads
4853962622
reported
mean coverage
314.1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.023
measured
pct q20 bases
97.9
measured
pct q30 bases
93.9
measured
gc content pct
39.9
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
28.91
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 89/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
314.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
93.9
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
28.91
measured
×0.5
35%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
3 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0