← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Leishmania major strain Friedlin
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1099209075
reported
total reads
14656121
reported
n content pct
0.008
measured
pct q20 bases
86.2
measured
pct q30 bases
77.8
measured
gc content pct
58
measured
mean read length
75
measured
mean base quality
31.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.17
measured
duplication rate pct
9.92
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 65/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
77.8
measured
×1
39%
mean base quality
31.6
measured
×0.6
60%
adapter content pct
0.17
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
9.92
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
35 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0