← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Rattus norvegicus
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
25 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1768755861808
reported
total reads
9850263751
reported
mean coverage
643.2
extrapolated
n content pct
0.008
measured
pct q20 bases
92.1
measured
pct q30 bases
87
measured
gc content pct
43.8
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
34.2
measured
adapter content pct
0.11
measured
duplication rate pct
2.4
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
643.2
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
87
measured
×1
85%
duplication rate pct
2.4
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.11
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
14 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0