ERP002469

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 11 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

11 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

76/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

145 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 453465327668 reported

total reads 2247051584 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 90.2 measured

pct q30 bases 83.5 measured

gc content pct 47 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 32.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.06 measured

duplication rate pct 16.4 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 76/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.5 measured ×1 68%

duplication rate pct 16.4 measured ×0.5 74%

adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0