ERP004081

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

575 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1102929021900 reported

total reads 14685310186 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 98.8 measured

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured

gc content pct 46.7 measured

mean read length 75 measured

mean base quality 37.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 21.74 measured

mean target coverage 17789.2 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 17789.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 21.74 measured ×0.5 71%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0