← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
uncultured bacterium
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
370225701
reported
total reads
733052
reported
n content pct
0.016
measured
pct q20 bases
92.1
measured
pct q30 bases
79.8
measured
gc content pct
51.1
measured
mean read length
476.5
measured
mean base quality
35
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
87.92
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 66/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
79.8
measured
×1
49%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0