← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
human nasopharyngeal metagenome
Instrument
unspecified
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,625 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
18980519657
reported
total reads
127153461
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
98.1
measured
pct q30 bases
93
measured
gc content pct
51.8
measured
mean read length
149
measured
mean base quality
35.1
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
96.12
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
2 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0