ERP006948

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Danio rerio

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

276 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 137977738080 reported

total reads 2122734432 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 92.1 measured

pct q30 bases 82.2 measured

gc content pct 29.7 measured

mean read length 55 measured

mean base quality 33.1 measured

adapter content pct 3.77 measured

duplication rate pct 42.51 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.2 measured ×1 61%

mean base quality 33.1 measured ×0.6 85%

adapter content pct 3.77 measured ×0.4 90%

duplication rate pct 42.51 measured ×0.4 72%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0