ERP007059

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

78/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

unidentified

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 453623943 reported

total reads 819760 reported

n content pct 0.013 measured

pct q20 bases 93.6 measured

pct q30 bases 83.5 measured

gc content pct 51.2 measured

mean read length 546.3 measured

mean base quality 35.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 93.48 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 78/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.5 measured ×1 68%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0