← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 15 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
15 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
human gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
312 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
778909667293
reported
total reads
4262914461
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
90.8
measured
pct q30 bases
70
measured
gc content pct
51.3
measured
mean read length
79.6
measured
mean base quality
31.2
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
0.82
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
70
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.82
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
5 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0