ERP010734

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

human lung metagenome

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

304 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4234591897 reported

total reads 14511862 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.7 measured

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured

gc content pct 51.4 measured

mean read length 291.6 measured

mean base quality 35.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.18 measured

duplication rate pct 93.73 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured ×1 99%

adapter content pct 0.18 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0