← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,699 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
928843547395
reported
total reads
7062891255
reported
mean coverage
201922.5
extrapolated
n content pct
0.009
measured
pct q20 bases
97.7
measured
pct q30 bases
94.9
measured
gc content pct
58.1
measured
mean read length
125
measured
mean base quality
35.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
9.51
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
201922.5
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
94.9
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
9.51
measured
×0.5
95%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0