← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Setaria italica
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3142829808
reported
total reads
43642542
reported
n content pct
0.062
measured
pct q20 bases
87.1
measured
pct q30 bases
79.2
measured
gc content pct
46.1
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
31.7
measured
adapter content pct
93.33
measured
duplication rate pct
61.98
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 39/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
79.2
measured
×1
46%
mean base quality
31.7
measured
×0.6
62%
adapter content pct
93.33
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
61.98
measured
×0.4
29%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0