ERP015182

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Hordeum vulgare

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

192 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 296059277200 reported

total reads 1480296386 reported

n content pct 0.055 measured

pct q20 bases 90.1 measured

pct q30 bases 80.2 measured

gc content pct 52 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 32.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.23 measured

duplication rate pct 14.1 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 80.2 measured ×1 51%

mean base quality 32.5 measured ×0.6 75%

adapter content pct 0.23 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 14.1 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0