ERP015317

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 10 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

10 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

46/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

3,288 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 177763137501 reported

total reads 354393342 reported

n content pct 0.213 measured

pct q20 bases 86.2 measured

pct q30 bases 79.3 measured

gc content pct 52.8 measured

mean read length 251 measured

mean base quality 32.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.03 measured

duplication rate pct 85.61 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 46/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 79.3 measured ×1 47%

duplication rate pct 85.61 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0.03 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0