← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
9,203 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
12216798208702
reported
total reads
80905948402
reported
mean coverage
1018066.5
extrapolated
n content pct
0.013
measured
pct q20 bases
97.4
measured
pct q30 bases
93.7
measured
gc content pct
37.5
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
39.5
measured
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
duplication rate pct
30.94
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 88/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
1018066.5
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
93.7
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
30.94
measured
×0.5
28%
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
37 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0