ERP122203
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Soft coral (Pinnigorgia flava) RNA-seq on MiniSeq with 633 million 50 bp reads at 97.6% Q20 and 95.3% Q30 across 63.3 Gb supports comprehensive transcriptome analysis. The 43.7% GC reflects cnidarian composition; high throughput enables characterization of coral reproduction, disease response, and environmental adaptations.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.