← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Danio rerio
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
664728014
reported
total reads
8982811
reported
n content pct
0.047
measured
pct q20 bases
97
measured
pct q30 bases
9.6
measured
gc content pct
46.8
measured
mean read length
37
measured
mean base quality
27.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
duplication rate pct
31.07
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
9.6
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
27.9
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
31.07
measured
×0.4
98%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0