ERR004023

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Danio rerio

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 492567696 reported

total reads 6841218 reported

n content pct 0.028 measured

pct q20 bases 77.6 measured

pct q30 bases 0.3 measured

gc content pct 45.5 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 22 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 9.79 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 0.3 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 22 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 9.79 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0