ERR006704

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

69/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

human metagenome

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 380350 reported

read count 1494 reported

parent study PRJEB2017 reported

library layout SINGLE reported

read length bp 254.6 extrapolated

library strategy AMPLICON reported

checksums present yes reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 69/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 0%

read length reported ×0.8 100%

layout paired reported ×0.6 40%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 100%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently