ERR030899

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

31/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6214847700 reported

total reads 82864636 reported

n content pct 2.681 measured

pct q20 bases 55.2 measured

pct q30 bases 42 measured

gc content pct 44.1 measured

mean read length 75 measured

mean base quality 20.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.04 measured

duplication rate pct 37.4 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 31/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 42 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 20.6 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0.04 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 37.4 measured ×0.4 84%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0