ERR032236

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3438004704 reported

total reads 22618452 reported

n content pct 0.105 measured

pct q20 bases 97.7 measured

pct q30 bases 77.4 measured

gc content pct 48.4 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 33.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 12.36 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 77.4 measured ×1 37%

mean base quality 33.7 measured ×0.6 95%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 12.36 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0