← Dataset search
ERR037521
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
51/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
6.45
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1436919600
reported
total reads
9579464
reported
n content pct
0.008
measured
pct q20 bases
91.2
measured
pct q30 bases
80.4
measured
pct reads q30
79.2
measured
sampled bases
68539050
measured
sampled reads
913854
measured
gc content pct
64.8
measured
polyg tail pct
0.14
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-10.5
measured
read length max
75
measured
read length min
75
measured
read length n50
75
measured
max base quality
40
measured
mean read length
75
measured
max n pct per pos
0.272
measured
mean base quality
33.4
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
75
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
34.8
measured
duplication rate pct
37.11
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 51/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
80.4
measured
×1
52%
duplication rate pct
37.11
measured
×0.5
9%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
38 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0