ERR056990

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

43/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

454 GS Junior

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 285971166 reported

total reads 297621 reported

n content pct 0.017 measured

pct q20 bases 77.5 measured

pct q30 bases 46.9 measured

gc content pct 44.3 measured

mean read length 481.6 measured

mean base quality 27.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 13.36 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 43/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 46.9 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 13.36 measured ×0.5 83%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0