ERR056999

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

454 GS Junior

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 158991200 reported

total reads 198449 reported

n content pct 0.031 measured

pct q20 bases 81.4 measured

pct q30 bases 51.6 measured

gc content pct 60.2 measured

mean read length 451.2 measured

mean base quality 29.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 29.9 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 51.6 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 29.9 measured ×0.5 32%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0