ERR057000

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

30/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

454 GS Junior

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 202888838 reported

total reads 260084 reported

n content pct 0.024 measured

pct q20 bases 79.4 measured

pct q30 bases 49.1 measured

gc content pct 49 measured

mean read length 440.8 measured

mean base quality 28.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 29.67 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 30/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 49.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 29.67 measured ×0.5 32%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0