← Dataset search
ERR1019036
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
241037999400
reported
total reads
1205189997
reported
mean coverage
77.8
extrapolated
n content pct
0.015
measured
pct q20 bases
91.1
measured
pct q30 bases
81.5
measured
gc content pct
55.5
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
32.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
duplication rate pct
8.28
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 86/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
77.8
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
81.5
measured
×1
57%
duplication rate pct
8.28
measured
×0.5
99%
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
30 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0