ERR10445920

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

79/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bos taurus

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 60068390610 reported

total reads 400748944 reported

mean coverage 22.2 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.2 measured

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured

gc content pct 40.1 measured

mean read length 149.9 measured

mean base quality 35.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 23.35 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 79/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 22.2 extrapolated ×1.2 65%

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 23.35 measured ×0.5 52%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0