← Dataset search
ERR10445952
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Bos taurus
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
55692545739
reported
total reads
371612614
reported
mean coverage
20.6
extrapolated
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
93.9
measured
gc content pct
39.6
measured
mean read length
149.9
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
26.75
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 74/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
20.6
extrapolated
×1.2
57%
pct q30 bases
93.9
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
26.75
measured
×0.5
41%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0