ERR10557463

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

59/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bos taurus

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 29900391300 reported

total reads 199335942 reported

mean coverage 11.1 extrapolated

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured

gc content pct 44.3 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

adapter content pct 0.13 measured

duplication rate pct 23.38 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 59/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 11.1 extrapolated ×1.2 14%

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 23.38 measured ×0.5 52%

adapter content pct 0.13 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0