← Dataset search
ERR110084
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Acinetobacter baumannii
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
6.8
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
529637200
reported
total reads
2648186
reported
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
98.2
measured
pct q30 bases
94
measured
pct reads q30
98.7
measured
sampled bases
50882800
measured
sampled reads
508828
measured
gc content pct
39.1
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-1.4
measured
read length max
100
measured
read length min
100
measured
read length n50
100
measured
max base quality
50
measured
mean read length
100
measured
max n pct per pos
0.196
measured
mean base quality
39.3
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
100
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
40.3
measured
duplication rate pct
3.91
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
3.91
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
14 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0