ERR110095

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Acinetobacter baumannii

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 6.84 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 318102400 reported

total reads 1590512 reported

n content pct 0.005 measured

pct q20 bases 97.9 measured

pct q30 bases 93.2 measured

pct reads q30 98.5 measured

sampled bases 50990700 measured

sampled reads 509907 measured

gc content pct 38.9 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 0 measured

quality dropoff -1.4 measured

read length max 100 measured

read length min 100 measured

read length n50 100 measured

max base quality 50 measured

mean read length 100 measured

max n pct per pos 0.198 measured

mean base quality 39 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 100 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

median read quality 39.9 measured

duplication rate pct 4.02 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.2 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 4.02 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0