← Dataset search
ERR11404462
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.15
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
218092421
reported
total reads
1851164
reported
n content pct
0.234
measured
pct q20 bases
88.8
measured
pct q30 bases
79.4
measured
pct reads q30
83
measured
sampled bases
61037898
measured
sampled reads
519731
measured
gc content pct
64.7
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
58.6
measured
quality dropoff
1.3
measured
read length max
301
measured
read length min
35
measured
read length n50
125
measured
max base quality
38
measured
mean read length
117.4
measured
max n pct per pos
0.903
measured
mean base quality
32.6
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
44.68
measured
read length median
105
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
35.8
measured
duplication rate pct
7.51
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.9
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 72/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
79.4
measured
×1
47%
duplication rate pct
7.51
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0