← Dataset search
ERR11406680
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
6
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1216482838
reported
total reads
8191102
reported
n content pct
0.023
measured
pct q20 bases
97
measured
pct q30 bases
92.5
measured
pct reads q30
96.5
measured
sampled bases
108022029
measured
sampled reads
727951
measured
gc content pct
66.5
measured
polyg tail pct
0.09
measured
read length sd
11.9
measured
quality dropoff
0.1
measured
read length max
151
measured
read length min
35
measured
read length n50
151
measured
max base quality
37
measured
mean read length
148.4
measured
max n pct per pos
0.123
measured
mean base quality
35.7
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
1.8
measured
read length median
151
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
36.6
measured
duplication rate pct
20.48
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.09
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 90/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.5
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
20.48
measured
×0.5
61%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0