ERR11406752

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 6.3 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2045726751 reported

total reads 14136340 reported

n content pct 0.03 measured

pct q20 bases 95.6 measured

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured

pct reads q30 93.4 measured

sampled bases 102680653 measured

sampled reads 709673 measured

gc content pct 65.8 measured

polyg tail pct 0.14 measured

read length sd 17.5 measured

quality dropoff 0 measured

read length max 151 measured

read length min 35 measured

read length n50 151 measured

max base quality 37 measured

mean read length 144.7 measured

max n pct per pos 0.126 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 4.32 measured

read length median 150 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

median read quality 36.4 measured

duplication rate pct 19.16 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.12 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured ×1 99%

duplication rate pct 19.16 measured ×0.5 65%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0