← Dataset search
ERR11493095
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Enterococcus lactis
Instrument
unspecified
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
6.5
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
359463273
reported
total reads
2387648
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
92
measured
pct q30 bases
87.7
measured
pct reads q30
89.8
measured
sampled bases
88105188
measured
sampled reads
585143
measured
gc content pct
40
measured
polyg tail pct
5.41
measured
read length sd
0.7
measured
quality dropoff
-1.7
measured
read length max
151
measured
read length min
138
measured
read length n50
151
measured
max base quality
36
measured
mean read length
150.6
measured
max n pct per pos
0.019
measured
mean base quality
33.2
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
151
measured
adapter content pct
22.52
measured
median read quality
34
measured
duplication rate pct
24.69
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 59/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
87.7
measured
×1
89%
duplication rate pct
24.69
measured
×0.5
48%
adapter content pct
22.52
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0