ERR11493145

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

69/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus lactis

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 5.78 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 571964363 reported

total reads 3799452 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.6 measured

pct q30 bases 91.4 measured

pct reads q30 94 measured

sampled bases 91370188 measured

sampled reads 606933 measured

gc content pct 39.5 measured

polyg tail pct 1.68 measured

read length sd 0.7 measured

quality dropoff -0.5 measured

read length max 151 measured

read length min 139 measured

read length n50 151 measured

max base quality 36 measured

mean read length 150.5 measured

max n pct per pos 0.003 measured

mean base quality 34.1 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 151 measured

adapter content pct 14.24 measured

median read quality 34.8 measured

duplication rate pct 21.52 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 69/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 21.52 measured ×0.5 58%

adapter content pct 14.24 measured ×0.4 5%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0