← Dataset search
ERR11493196
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Enterococcus lactis
Instrument
unspecified
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
4.73
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
348432906
reported
total reads
1499106
reported
n content pct
0.013
measured
pct q20 bases
90.1
measured
pct q30 bases
86.8
measured
pct reads q30
86.8
measured
sampled bases
65172882
measured
sampled reads
281529
measured
gc content pct
40
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
47.9
measured
quality dropoff
3.5
measured
read length max
251
measured
read length min
35
measured
read length n50
251
measured
max base quality
40
measured
mean read length
231.5
measured
max n pct per pos
0.088
measured
mean base quality
34.8
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
4.91
measured
read length median
251
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
36.7
measured
duplication rate pct
13.58
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.09
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 87/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
86.8
measured
×1
84%
duplication rate pct
13.58
measured
×0.5
83%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
50 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0