ERR11493202

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus lactis

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 4.5 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 461450496 reported

total reads 2348832 reported

n content pct 0.019 measured

pct q20 bases 96.4 measured

pct q30 bases 95.1 measured

pct reads q30 96.8 measured

sampled bases 72101322 measured

sampled reads 370259 measured

gc content pct 39.7 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 62.2 measured

quality dropoff 3.5 measured

read length max 251 measured

read length min 35 measured

read length n50 249 measured

max base quality 40 measured

mean read length 194.7 measured

max n pct per pos 0.113 measured

mean base quality 36.8 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 10.36 measured

read length median 217 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

median read quality 37.9 measured

duplication rate pct 18.72 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.11 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 18.72 measured ×0.5 67%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 52 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0