ERR11493207

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus lactis

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 7.01 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 374138350 reported

total reads 2484652 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 92.3 measured

pct q30 bases 87.3 measured

pct reads q30 90 measured

sampled bases 87918950 measured

sampled reads 583829 measured

gc content pct 40.5 measured

polyg tail pct 9.61 measured

read length sd 0.7 measured

quality dropoff -1.4 measured

read length max 151 measured

read length min 139 measured

read length n50 151 measured

max base quality 36 measured

mean read length 150.6 measured

max n pct per pos 0.037 measured

mean base quality 33.2 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 151 measured

adapter content pct 30.9 measured

median read quality 33.9 measured

duplication rate pct 20.75 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.3 measured ×1 87%

duplication rate pct 20.75 measured ×0.5 60%

adapter content pct 30.9 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0