← Dataset search
ERR11493211
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Enterococcus lactis
Instrument
unspecified
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
5.94
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
261087412
reported
total reads
1734446
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
89.8
measured
pct q30 bases
84.7
measured
pct reads q30
80.7
measured
sampled bases
84519779
measured
sampled reads
561468
measured
gc content pct
39.5
measured
polyg tail pct
0.97
measured
read length sd
0.8
measured
quality dropoff
-1.5
measured
read length max
151
measured
read length min
140
measured
read length n50
151
measured
max base quality
36
measured
mean read length
150.5
measured
max n pct per pos
0.006
measured
mean base quality
32.7
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
151
measured
adapter content pct
7.63
measured
median read quality
34
measured
duplication rate pct
17.02
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 69/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
84.7
measured
×1
74%
duplication rate pct
17.02
measured
×0.5
72%
adapter content pct
7.63
measured
×0.4
53%
QC cost
17 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0