ERR12512574

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

94/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bos taurus

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 88002084260 reported

total reads 582795260 reported

mean coverage 32.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 98 measured

pct q30 bases 95 measured

gc content pct 42.9 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 36.1 measured

adapter content pct 2.17 measured

duplication rate pct 17.5 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 94/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 32.6 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 95 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 17.5 measured ×0.5 70%

adapter content pct 2.17 measured ×0.4 92%

QC cost 37 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0